Suddenly a lot of people began to say that we have a lot of resemblences and influences - some of them claims that we was inspired by Pink Floyd, some of them told about King Crimson, others about Gentle Giant, Led Zeppelin, Jethro Tull and Queen, and so and on, namig also a lot of rock groups that we've never heard before. Of course we had influences, but not in the way that people think off. Personally I'm nobody's fan, and I'll never be. I'm "just" an artist. That's why I reply them that it would be impossible for us to contain all this big legendary rock groups in one, isn't it? The truth was very simple instead and to explain this (or to avoid their need to qualifie art) I quote Oscar Wilde: 'When critics don't agree with each other the artist is fully satistied'." A simple proof of our originality is that we haven't composed tones of music in 9 years but one single album.
And after that we broke up. Anyway, I'm glad that some people still enjoy our music (after many years) even if they try to qualifie us one way or another. It means that a seeker always creates discomfort and that means evolution, isn't it? (Andu - listener) They never hit "big time", but their album still stands the test of time after the band ceased to exist soon after (2000). Read more on Last.fm. User-contributed text is available under the Creative Commons By-SA License; additional terms may apply..
show me more